Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Lawrence DOUGLAS, appellant.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Molea, J.), rendered May 11, 2000, convicting him of manslaughter in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
The evidence adduced at trial established that the defendant stabbed the unarmed decedent a total of 16 times and fractured his arm, in a dispute over a wager. According to one witness's account, after the attack the defendant stated “[t]he guy robbed me and I stabbed him.”
The defendant's contention that the People failed to offer legally sufficient evidence disproving the defense of justification beyond a reasonable doubt is unpreserved for appellate review, as he did not raise this claim before the County Court (see People v. Brown, 12 A.D.3d 524, 783 N.Y.S.2d 866, lv. denied 4 N.Y.3d 742, 790 N.Y.S.2d 654, 824 N.E.2d 55; People v. Clarke, 11 A.D.3d 554, 782 N.Y.S.2d 814, lv. denied 3 N.Y.3d 755, 788 N.Y.S.2d 672, 821 N.E.2d 977). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620, 467 N.Y.S.2d 349, 454 N.E.2d 932; People v. Florival, 262 A.D.2d 499, 691 N.Y.S.2d 327), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the elements of manslaughter in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, and to disprove the defense of justification beyond a reasonable doubt (see People v. Manning, 8 A.D.3d 298, 777 N.Y.S.2d 671; People v. Henry, 244 A.D.2d 424, 664 N.Y.S.2d 315; People v. Granados, 198 A.D.2d 298, 603 N.Y.S.2d 877). Moreover, resolution of issues of credibility, as well as the weight to be accorded to the evidence presented, are primarily questions to be determined by the trier of fact, which saw and heard the witnesses (see People v. Gaimari, 176 N.Y. 84, 68 N.E. 112). Its determination should be accorded great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record (see People v. Garafolo, 44 A.D.2d 86, 353 N.Y.S.2d 500). Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15[5] ).
The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: April 04, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)