Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: William F. BONEZ, Petitioner, v. B. CLARK, as Hearing Officer, Southport Correctional Facility, et al., Respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Chemung County) to review two determinations of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner challenges two separate prison disciplinary determinations each of which found him guilty of committing an unhygienic act by throwing feces. Contrary to petitioner's contention, the combination of the first misbehavior report, the photographs of the feces, and the hearing testimony of the correction officers who analyzed the angle from which the feces was thrown and concluded that it originated from petitioner's cell, constitute substantial evidence to support the first determination that petitioner committed an unhygienic act (see, Matter of Headley v. Goord, 274 A.D.2d 714, 715, 711 N.Y.S.2d 214, 215; Matter of Hernandez v. Coombe, 228 A.D.2d 760, 643 N.Y.S.2d 724). Moreover, the second misbehavior report, together with the evidence that feces were observed in the vicinity of petitioner's cell during the same time period in which petitioner was seen attempting to dispose of a styrofoam cup containing feces, provide substantial evidence to support the second determination of guilt (see, Matter of Almonte v. Goord, 261 A.D.2d 684, 685, 690 N.Y.S.2d 757, lv. denied 93 N.Y.2d 818, 697 N.Y.S.2d 565, 719 N.E.2d 926; Matter of Burt v. McGinnis, 249 A.D.2d 650, 671 N.Y.S.2d 182). Petitioner's assertions of innocence at the disciplinary hearings created credibility issues for the Hearing Officers to resolve (see, Matter of Ellison v. Goord, 269 A.D.2d 639, 704 N.Y.S.2d 168; Matter of Almonte v. Goord, supra, at 685, 690 N.Y.S.2d 757).
Petitioner's remaining contentions have been reviewed and rejected as unpersuasive.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: September 21, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)