Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Anthony RIVERA, Petitioner, v. David MILLER, as Superintendent of Eastern Correctional Facility, et al., Respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Ulster County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Following a tier III hearing, petitioner, a prison inmate, was found guilty of assault on an inmate and violent conduct. Upon petitioner's administrative appeal, the determination was affirmed. Petitioner subsequently commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding and we confirm.
We reject petitioner's contention that the misbehavior report is defective because it fails to state the specific role that petitioner played in the assault (see, 7 NYCRR 251-3.1[c] ). The misbehavior report states that petitioner, acting in concert with others, cut another inmate in the face with a razor-type weapon. Thus, the report contained the required specificity (see, Matter of Vogelsang v. Coombe, 105 A.D.2d 913, 914, 482 N.Y.S.2d 348, affd. on mem below 66 N.Y.2d 835, 498 N.Y.S.2d 364, 489 N.E.2d 251).
Contrary to petitioner's contention, the detailed misbehavior report and the testimony from the correction officer who authored it, together with the testimony from the confidential informant stating that petitioner did inflict serious injury upon another inmate, provide substantial evidence to support the determination of petitioner's guilt (see, Matter of Cobb v. Selsky, 270 A.D.2d 747, 706 N.Y.S.2d 199; Matter of Santos v. Goord, 255 A.D.2d 949, 681 N.Y.S.2d 921). Moreover, nothing in the record supports petitioner's claim that the Hearing Officer presiding at this proceeding was biased or that the outcome of the hearing flowed from the alleged bias (see, Matter of Bernier v. Goord, 255 A.D.2d 949, 704 N.Y.S.2d 169). Petitioner's remaining contentions have been examined and found to be without merit.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 15, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)