Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Fernando A. CLARKE, Appellant, v. NEW YORK CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent New York City Board of Education, dated March 22, 1995, which (1) adopted the findings of an Administrative Law Judge, dated February 2, 1995, made after a hearing, that the petitioner had been properly served with a copy of the charges and notice of hearing, and that he had been absent without authorization from work since February 14, 1994, and (2) discharged him from his position as a purchasing agent.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.
The record supports the discharge of the petitioner from his employment upon the findings of the Administrative Law Judge, inter alia, that the petitioner had been absent from work without authorization. The only evidence adduced at the hearing held pursuant to Civil Service Law § 75 showed that the petitioner had been absent from work without authorization since February 14, 1994, and that he failed to tender any acceptable excuse therefor. Further, the petitioner failed to attend the hearing or offer any proof on his own behalf, even though he was aware of the time and place that the hearing was to be held. Thus, we find that the respondent's determination was supported by substantial evidence (see, 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v. State Div. of Human Rights, 45 N.Y.2d 176, 408 N.Y.S.2d 54, 379 N.E.2d 1183; see also, Matter of Barresi v. Mahoney, 230 A.D.2d 906, 647 N.Y.S.2d 25).
The petitioner's remaining contentions are without merit.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 08, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)