Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Jamel BROWN, Petitioner, v. Glenn S. GOORD, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
After receiving two misbehavior reports for violating prison disciplinary rules against smuggling, refusing a direct order and violating visiting room procedures, petitioner was found guilty of all charges. According to the first report, a correction officer watching a videotape of the visiting room observed petitioner place his hand down his pants towards his groin and then push something across the table to his visitor. The second report alleges that petitioner was then ordered to come to the door of the visiting room. Petitioner stayed in his seat, despite several more orders, and appeared to swallow something before complying. The record does not show that any contraband was recovered.
The misbehavior reports, as well as the videotape of the incident, provide substantial evidence of petitioner's guilt (see Matter of Morales v. Goord, 290 A.D.2d 790, 791, 736 N.Y.S.2d 494 [2002]; Matter of Green v. Selsky, 284 A.D.2d 617, 618, 726 N.Y.S.2d 170 [2001], lv. denied 96 N.Y.2d 721, 733 N.Y.S.2d 373, 759 N.E.2d 372 [2001] ). Petitioner's explanation that he was “adjust[ing]” himself, and did not hear the correction officer's order at first, presented a credibility issue to be resolved by the Hearing Officer (see Matter of Price v. Goord, 301 A.D.2d 986, 987, 754 N.Y.S.2d 453 [2003]; Matter of Morales v. Goord, supra at 791, 736 N.Y.S.2d 494). As for petitioner's argument that certain evidence was improperly excluded at the hearing, we note that the evidence at issue was unavailable (see Matter of Ruiz v. Goord, 289 A.D.2d 810, 810-811, 735 N.Y.S.2d 434 [2001] ).
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: July 08, 2004
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)