Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Thomas G. VOSS, et al., appellants, v. ROCKLAND COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE, et al., respondents.
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Weiner, J.), dated December 21, 2005, which denied their motion for summary judgment and granted the defendants' cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Education Law § 6306(2) states, in relevant part, that “[t]he board of trustees of each community college shall appoint a president for the college, subject to approval by the state university trustees” (see also 8 NYCRR 600.2). Here, the plaintiffs failed to establish, prima facie, that they were entitled to summary judgment (see Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557, 427 N.Y.S.2d 595, 404 N.E.2d 718). In contrast, the defendants made a prima facie showing of their entitlement to summary judgment dismissing the cause of action to recover damages for breach of contract, as the State University of New York Board of Trustees did not approve the contract seeking to extend the appointment of the plaintiff Thomas G. Voss as the interim community college president. In opposition, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Consequently, the Supreme Court properly summarily dismissed the plaintiffs' remaining causes of action to recover damages for tortious interference with contractual relations and to recover litigation costs and attorneys' fees, as those causes of action were predicated upon the invalid contract.
In light of our determination, the parties' remaining contentions have been rendered academic.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: March 27, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)