Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent, v. Benjamin TETTEH, Appellant.
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to stay arbitration of an underinsured motorist claim, Benjamin Tetteh appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Lefkowitz, J.), entered May 15, 2000, as declared that the petitioner's maximum potential liability following arbitration under the subject policy is $50,000.
ORDERED that the order is reversed insofar as appealed, on the law, with costs, and the declaration is vacated.
The Supreme Court erred in considering the issue of the maximum liability of Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (hereinafter Liberty Mutual). “In effect [Liberty Mutual] inserted an application for a declaratory judgment into the proceeding for a stay of arbitration, without statutory authorization” (Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v. Olsen, 222 A.D.2d 579, 580, 634 N.Y.S.2d 773). Pursuant to CPLR 7503, a court may stay arbitration, inter alia, on the ground that a valid agreement to arbitrate was not made or has not been complied with, or that the claim is untimely. “The courts have no authority to grant a stay of arbitration on the ground that the damages sought under a policy are excessive” (Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v. Olsen, supra, at 581, 634 N.Y.S.2d 773; cf., Matter of General Acc. Ins. Co. v. Brown, 263 A.D.2d 542, 693 N.Y.S.2d 223; Matter of Commerce and Indus. Ins. Co. v. Weber, 240 A.D.2d 742, 660 N.Y.S.2d 1001; Matter of Government Empls. Ins. Co. v. Abbensett, 240 A.D.2d 578, 659 N.Y.S.2d 73, [all upholding stays of arbitration on issue of excessiveness of damages only where no additional recovery would be possible, thus rendering arbitration academic] ). Rather, the issues of the extent of the insurer's liability and the availability of offsets are matters expressly within the language of the arbitration clause of the relevant Supplemental Uninsured Motorist endorsements, and thus must be determined at arbitration.
In light of our determination, we do not reach the parties' remaining contentions.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 06, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)