Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York ex rel. Gary H. MOORE, Appellant, v. Sheridan CONNOLLY, as Acting Superintendent of Lyon Mountain Correctional Facility, Respondent.
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Feldstein, J.), entered February 11, 2008 in Clinton County, which denied petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70, without a hearing.
In 1995, petitioner was convicted of burglary in the second degree and was sentenced as a persistent violent felony offender to 15 years to life in prison. His conviction was later affirmed on appeal (People v. Moore, 248 A.D.2d 405, 669 N.Y.S.2d 638 [1998], lv. denied 91 N.Y.2d 1010, 676 N.Y.S.2d 138, 698 N.E.2d 967 [1998] ) and his subsequent application for a writ of error coram nobis was denied (People v. Moore, 38 A.D.3d 683, 830 N.Y.S.2d 665 [2007] ). Petitioner then commenced the instant proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70 for a writ of habeas corpus seeking to be released from prison. Supreme Court denied petitioner's application without a hearing, resulting in this appeal.
In support of his application, petitioner contends that his waiver of indictment was jurisdictionally defective because he was not held over for grand jury action in accordance with CPL 195.10 and did not sign a written instrument waiving indictment under CPL 195.20. Inasmuch as this claim, albeit jurisdictional in nature, could have been raised on direct appeal or in a CPL article 440 motion, habeas corpus relief is unavailable (see People ex rel. McDermott v. Artus, 38 A.D.3d 957, 830 N.Y.S.2d 847 [2007], lv. denied 8 N.Y.3d 814, 838 N.Y.S.2d 840, 870 N.E.2d 160 [2007]; see also People ex rel. Spaulding v. Napoli, 50 A.D.3d 1330, 1331, 857 N.Y.S.2d 258 [2008], lv. denied 88 N.Y.2d 942, 647 N.Y.S.2d 176, 670 N.E.2d 460 [1996], lv. dismissed 94 N.Y.2d 907, 707 N.Y.S.2d 392, 728 N.E.2d 991 [2000]; People ex rel. Alvarez v. West, 22 A.D.3d 996, 996, 802 N.Y.S.2d 391 [2005], lv. denied 6 N.Y.3d 704, 811 N.Y.S.2d 336, 844 N.E.2d 791 [2006] ). Under the circumstances presented, we find no reason to depart from traditional orderly procedure (see People ex rel. Spaulding v. Napoli, 50 A.D.3d at 1331, 857 N.Y.S.2d 258; People ex rel. Alvarez v. West, 22 A.D.3d at 996, 802 N.Y.S.2d 391).
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 06, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)