Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Maria GONZALEZ, etc., appellant, v. John CIRRI, etc., et al., respondents.
In an action, inter alia, for specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Satterfield, J.), entered August 23, 2007, as granted that branch of the defendants' motion which was to vacate an order and judgment (one paper) of the same court entered April 27, 2006, which, after an inquest, among other things, directed specific performance of the contract.
ORDERED that the order entered August 23, 2007, is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and that branch of the defendants' motion which was to vacate the order and judgment entered April 27, 2006, is denied.
The Supreme Court erred in granting that branch of the defendants' motion which was to vacate the order and judgment entered April 27, 2006, upon the default of the decedent Rosalie Cirri and the defendant Frank Cirri, Sr., inter alia, directing specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property. The defendants failed to meet their burden of demonstrating, by competent admissible medical evidence, that the decedent Rosalie Cirri was incapable of protecting her rights at the time the action was commenced and at the time that the order and judgment was entered (see CPLR 1203; Mohrmann v. Lynch-Mohrmann, 24 A.D.3d 735, 736, 809 N.Y.S.2d 115; Matter of Forte v. Forte, 304 A.D.2d 577, 758 N.Y.S.2d 130; Urban Pathways v. Lublin, 227 A.D.2d 186, 642 N.Y.S.2d 26). Nor was there any evidence that the plaintiff had notice that the decedent was under any mental disability (cf. Matter of Fischer v. Fischer, 21 A.D.3d 554, 555, 800 N.Y.S.2d 586; State of New York v. Kama, 267 A.D.2d 225, 226, 699 N.Y.S.2d 472; Sarfaty v. Sarfaty, 83 A.D.2d 748, 749, 443 N.Y.S.2d 506) or that the plaintiff actively concealed any possible mental disability with which the decedent may have been afflicted (see Matter of Forte v. Forte, 304 A.D.2d 577, 758 N.Y.S.2d 130; Urban Pathways v. Lublin, 227 A.D.2d 186, 642 N.Y.S.2d 26).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 05, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)