Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: ZHANG WAN, Petitioner, v. Donald SELSKY, as Director of Special Housing/Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner challenges a determination finding him guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule which prohibits inmates from possessing a weapon.1 According to the misbehavior report and testimony adduced at petitioner's disciplinary hearing, a correction officer who was ordered to secure petitioner's cell while petitioner's belongings were being packed and moved discovered a single-edged razor secreted in the radiator of the cell. Contrary to petitioner's assertion, the misbehavior report and testimony of the correction officer who discovered the razor provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see, Matter of Francois v. Goord, 275 A.D.2d 852, 713 N.Y.S.2d 230). Although petitioner denied that the razor was his, the correction officer's testimony that no one entered petitioner's cell during the move and that the razor found therein appeared to be in new condition is sufficient to support the inference of possession by petitioner (see, Matter of Francois v. Goord, supra; Matter of Hamlett v. Goord, 275 A.D.2d 497, 712 N.Y.S.2d 214).
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
FOOTNOTES
1. Petitioner pleaded guilty to the charge of failure to report an illness.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 14, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)