Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Michael RUTIGLIANO, Appellant.
Appeal by the defendant, by permission, from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Irizarry, J.), dated September 28, 1999, which denied his motion, pursuant to CPL 440.20, to vacate a sentence imposing a term of imprisonment of 4 to 12 years, upon a judgment of the same court, rendered June 9, 1998, convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree.
ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, the sentence is vacated, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for further proceedings in accordance herewith.
The defendant contends that the Supreme Court erred in imposing an enhanced sentence because he was slightly late in appearing at his original sentencing proceeding on May 18, 1998. We agree. The record of the defendant's plea proceeding does not substantiate the People's assertion that the defendant knew he was to appear for sentencing at 9:30 A.M. on the appointed sentencing date. Similarly, the record does not substantiate the sentencing court's conclusion that the defendant had been given “explicit instructions” to appear for sentencing at 11:15 A.M. on the appointed date. Thus, when the defendant appeared “late in the morning on the date of sentence”, the court was not authorized to impose an enhanced sentence in excess of a term of imprisonment of 1 1/414 to 3 3/434 years agreed upon pursuant to the plea agreement, without affording the defendant the opportunity to withdraw his plea of guilty (see, People v. Curcio, 276 A.D.2d 639, 714 N.Y.S.2d 512; People v. Milo, 235 A.D.2d 552, 654 N.Y.S.2d 146; People v. Calendar, 227 A.D.2d 639, 643 N.Y.S.2d 388; People v. McKinney, 215 A.D.2d 407, 625 N.Y.S.2d 667; People v. Hodge, 207 A.D.2d 845, 616 N.Y.S.2d 978). Accordingly, the matter is remitted for the Supreme Court, Kings County, to impose the agreed-upon sentence, or for the defendant to be permitted to withdraw his plea of guilty (see, People v. Michael, 190 A.D.2d 758, 593 N.Y.S.2d 292).
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 04, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)