Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Steven LASHWAY, Appellant, v. William D. BROWN, as Superintendent of Sullivan Correctional Facility, et al., Respondents.
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Malone Jr., J.), entered March 15, 2000 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services finding petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.
Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination which found him guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule prohibiting violent conduct. Supreme Court dismissed the petition and we affirm. Petitioner's sole contention that his disciplinary hearing was untimely (see, 7 NYCRR 251-5.1[a] ) is unpersuasive. Initially, the hearing was not required to be commenced within seven days of petitioner's confinement for mental health observation because the confinement was unrelated to the incident giving rise to the misbehavior report (see, Matter of West v. Costello, 270 A.D.2d 673, 674, 705 N.Y.S.2d 417; Matter of Faison v. Senkowski, 256 A.D.2d 702, 681 N.Y.S.2d 798, appeal dismissed 93 N.Y.2d 870, 689 N.Y.S.2d 17, 711 N.E.2d 202). In any event, the delay was authorized by a valid extension providing that the hearing was to be completed within 14 days following petitioner's release from confinement (see, 7 NYCRR 251-5.1[a] ), and the hearing was timely completed pursuant to a second extension properly obtained for the purpose of securing the testimony of one of petitioner's witnesses (see, 7 NYCRR 251-5.1[b]; see also, Matter of Stokes v. Goord, 254 A.D.2d 558, 680 N.Y.S.2d 126, lv. denied 92 N.Y.2d 819, 685 N.Y.S.2d 420, 708 N.E.2d 177; Matter of Greene v. Coombe, 238 A.D.2d 813, 656 N.Y.S.2d 522, lv. denied 91 N.Y.2d 801, 666 N.Y.S.2d 563, 689 N.E.2d 533).
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 14, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)