Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Gabriel A. PEARSE, appellant, v. NEW YORK CITY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, respondent.
In a proceeding pursuant to Election Law § 16-102, inter alia, to validate so much of a petition as designated Gabriel A. Pearse as a candidate in a primary election to be held on September 14, 2004, for the nomination of the Democratic Party as its candidate for the public office of Member of the United States House of Representatives, 11th Congressional District, the petitioner appeals from a final order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Levine, J.), dated August 16, 2004, which, among other things, denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.
ORDERED that the final order is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the petition is granted, so much of the petition as designated Gabriel A. Pearse as a candidate in a primary election to be held on September 14, 2004, for the nomination of the Democratic Party as its candidate for the public office of Member of the United States House of Representatives, 11th Congressional District, is validated, and the Board of Elections of the City of New York is directed to place the name of Gabriel A. Pearse on the appropriate ballot.
The petitioner's amended cover sheet was in substantial compliance with the Election Law and the rules promulgated by the Board of Elections of the City of New York (hereinafter the Board) (see Election Law § 6-134[10]; 9 NYCRR 6215.6 [a]; Matter of Siems v. Lite, 307 A.D.2d 1016, 763 N.Y.S.2d 501; Matter of Most v. Walker, 297 A.D.2d 356, 746 N.Y.S.2d 410; Matter of Fromson v. Lefever, 112 A.D.2d 1064, 1066-1067, 493 N.Y.S.2d 169, affd. sub nom. Matter of Barrett v. Scaringe, 65 N.Y.2d 946, 493 N.Y.S.2d 1017, 483 N.E.2d 1149). In any event, the petitioner was neither notified of the Board's determination nor afforded the opportunity to cure the purported defect, as required by the Rules of the Board of Elections of the City of New York, D2 and E1 (see 9 NYCRR 6215.7[b] ).
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: August 24, 2004
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)