Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York ex rel. James BROWN, Appellant, v. Gary GREENE, as Superintendent of Great Meadow Correctional Facility, Respondent.
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Hemmett Jr., J.), entered November 19, 2003 in Washington County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70, dismissed the petition.
Petitioner, an inmate at a state correctional facility, made application for a writ of habeas corpus seeking release from prison. On September 24, 2003, Supreme Court signed the order to show cause which directed petitioner to serve the signed order, together with all supporting documentation, upon the Attorney General and the Washington County District Attorney by regular mail on or before October 15, 2003, and to provide the court with affidavits of service. Thereafter, petitioner informed such parties of the index number assigned to the case and served some papers, but neglected to serve a copy of the signed order to show cause containing the return date. Consequently, Supreme Court dismissed the petition for failure to comply with the service requirements set forth in the order to show cause. This appeal ensued.
We affirm. Absent a showing that imprisonment presented an uncontrollable obstacle to proper service, the failure to follow the service requirements set forth in an order to show cause is a jurisdictional defect requiring dismissal of the petition (see People ex rel. Watson v. Walsh, 7 A.D.3d 850, 776 N.Y.S.2d 352 [2004] ). Inasmuch as petitioner has made no claim that his incarceration prevented him from complying with the directives respecting service, his failure to serve a copy of the signed order to show cause mandates dismissal of the petition.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: September 16, 2004
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)