Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Thomas DiCICCO, Appellant, v. WYANDANCH VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT, INC., et al., Respondents.
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Executive Board of Directors of the Wyandanch Volunteer Fire Department, Inc., dated April 7, 1999, which dismissed the appellant from membership in the Wyandanch Volunteer Fire Department, Inc., the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Henry, J.), dated June 30, 2000, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The appellant was dismissed from membership in the Wyandanch Volunteer Fire Department, Inc. (hereinafter the WVF), based on his failure to submit to a drug test within 24 hours of his notification pursuant to the WVF's random drug-testing policy instituted the previous year. Contrary to the appellant's contention, he was provided with adequate notice of the charge against him and an opportunity for a hearing in accordance with the WVF bylaws (see, Leahy v. Jordan, 207 A.D.2d 385, 615 N.Y.S.2d 706; Ferrara v. Magee Volunteer Fire Dept., 191 A.D.2d 967, 594 N.Y.S.2d 506; Rapacki v. Board of Fire Commr. of the Uniondale Fire Dist., 75 A.D.2d 817, 427 N.Y.S.2d 478). The penalty of dismissal is not so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness (see, Matter of Pell v. Board of Educ., 34 N.Y.2d 222, 356 N.Y.S.2d 833, 313 N.E.2d 321; see also, Matter of Caruso v. Ward, 72 N.Y.2d 432, 534 N.Y.S.2d 142, 530 N.E.2d 850). We note that the appellant was given the opportunity to reapply for membership in the future.
The appellant's remaining contentions are without merit.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 18, 2001
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)