Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Ronald LYNCH, Petitioner, v. Glenn S. GOORD, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules that prohibit assaulting another inmate and fighting. The correction officer who wrote the misbehavior report testified that he had undertaken an investigation of a suspected fight after observing that the inmate who shared petitioner's cell had sustained severe bruises and bite marks. Under questioning, the inmate admitted that his injuries were the result of an assault perpetrated by petitioner. The correction officer's investigation report containing this information was introduced in evidence, as was a medical report prepared by the infirmary nurse who had examined the injured inmate, who related that the injured inmate had sustained a deviated septum, bruises under both eyes, abrasions on the back of his neck, a golf-ball sized swollen area on the left side of his head and bite marks on his left upper arm.
We find that substantial evidence was presented in support of the determination of petitioner's guilt (see, Matter of Lopez v. Goord, 284 A.D.2d 757, 728 N.Y.S.2d 532; Matter of Lunney v. Selsky, 275 A.D.2d 820, 821, 713 N.Y.S.2d 300). To the extent that petitioner's testimony and that of his witnesses conflicted with the other evidence presented at the hearing, this created an issue of credibility that was appropriately resolved in the discretion of the Hearing Officer (see, Matter of Soto v. New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs., 275 A.D.2d 851, 713 N.Y.S.2d 886). The remaining issues raised herein have been examined and found to be without merit.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: November 21, 2001
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)