Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Nathaniel JACKSON, Petitioner, v. Leonard PORTUONDO, as Superintendent of Shawangunk Correctional Facility, et al., Respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Ulster County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner challenges a determination finding him guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules prohibiting inmates from attempting to smuggle drugs into the facility and failing to comply with facility correspondence procedures. The misbehavior report relates that petitioner attempted to mail a letter which contained a secret code that, when deciphered, communicated a request that the addressee of the letter provide him with drugs in exchange for money when she came to visit him at the facility.
We confirm. Initially, we find that, notwithstanding petitioner's assertions to the contrary, the misbehavior report was sufficiently detailed to apprise petitioner of the charges against him and afforded him the opportunity to prepare a defense (see, Matter of Lamage v. Goord, 285 A.D.2d 724, 727 N.Y.S.2d 347; Matter of Seegars v. Goord, 245 A.D.2d 640, 665 N.Y.S.2d 110, lv. denied 91 N.Y.2d 811, 671 N.Y.S.2d 715, 694 N.E.2d 884). Moreover, we conclude that the misbehavior report, together with the evidence adduced at the hearing, including petitioner's own admissions concerning the letter, constitute substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see, Matter of Abdur-Raheem v. Mann, 85 N.Y.2d 113, 119, 623 N.Y.S.2d 758, 647 N.E.2d 1266; Matter of Green v. McGinnis, 262 A.D.2d 897, 692 N.Y.S.2d 523, lv. dismissed 94 N.Y.2d 931, 708 N.Y.S.2d 350, 729 N.E.2d 1150). Likewise, we are unpersuaded that the Hearing Officer was biased or improperly conducted his own investigation into the charges against petitioner (see, Matter of Caroselli v. Goord, 274 A.D.2d 903, 712 N.Y.S.2d 178). Petitioner's remaining arguments have been examined and found to be lacking in merit.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 21, 2001
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)