Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Joyce CHALLANDES, respondent, v. O. Paul SHEW, etc., et al., appellants.
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Village Manager of the Village of Ossining, dated December 31, 1998, which revoked the appointment of Joyce Challandes to the position of Data Entry Operator, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Leavitt, J .), entered May 6, 1999, which granted the petition and reinstated her to the position of Data Entry Operator with all back pay, salary, and other compensation which she would have received had her appointment not been revoked.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The documentary evidence overwhelmingly established that the Village Manager of Ossining appointed Joyce Challandes to the position of Data Entry Operator by an open, unequivocal act (see, People ex rel. Kresser v. Fitzsimmons, 68 N.Y. 514, 1877 WL 11891). Within one or two days of the appointment, Challandes was advised that she would be terminated. Pursuant to County of Westchester Civil Service Rule 11.1(a)(1), once appointed, Challandes must serve a minimum of 12 weeks before she may be removed at the discretion of the appointing authority, unless, after a hearing, she is removed for incompetence or misconduct pursuant to Civil Service Law § 75 (see, County of Westchester Civil Service Rule 11.7). Since there was no hearing, Challandes was removed in violation of the civil service rules (see, Matter of Albano v. Kirby, 36 N.Y.2d 526, 369 N.Y.S.2d 655, 330 N.E.2d 615). Accordingly, Challandes' petition to be reinstated to the position of Data Entry Operator with back pay, salary, and other compensation was properly granted.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: August 14, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)