Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Keith L. BROWNE, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed February 24, 2005, which ruled that claimant's request for a hearing was untimely.
Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that claimant failed to timely request a hearing challenging the September 24, 2004 initial determination ruling that he was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits. The record establishes that claimant received the initial determination shortly after it was mailed on September 24, 2004. Although the instructions on the reverse side of the determination indicated that he had 30 days to request a hearing, claimant failed to request a hearing until December 2004. According to claimant, the delay occurred because he misunderstood information from a representative of the Department of Labor regarding the time for an appeal. Under these circumstances, we find no reason to disturb the Board's decision that claimant failed to provide a reasonable excuse for not complying with the 30-day statutory time period in which to request a hearing (see Labor Law § 620 [1][a]; Matter of Jarrett [Commissioner of Labor], 13 A.D.3d 965, 787 N.Y.S.2d 448 [2004]; Matter of Meltzer [Commissioner of Labor], 298 A.D.2d 827, 748 N.Y.S.2d 713 [2002] ). Accordingly, the merits of the initial determination denying claimant's application for unemployment insurance benefits are not properly before this Court (see Matter of Brown [Commissioner of Labor], 4 A.D.3d 604, 770 N.Y.S.2d 919 [2004] ).
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 03, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)