Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
HSBC BANK USA, N.A., AS TRUSTEE FOR the REGISTERED HOLDERS OF RENAISSANCE EQUITY LOAN ASSET–BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2007–03, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Michael HANCHARD, Defendant–Appellant, Joan Hamilton, et al., Defendants.
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alison Y. Tuitt, J.), entered on October 26, 2016, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied defendant Michael Hanchard's motion to vacate a judgment of foreclosure entered upon his default, pursuant to CPLR 5015(a)(4), and dismiss the complaint for lack of jurisdiction, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
The court correctly found that jurisdiction had been obtained over defendant Michael Hanchard. Plaintiff established prima facie that defendant was properly served with process by showing, pursuant to CPLR 308(4), that on three separate occasions and times, the process server made efforts to serve defendant at his last known address in Florida (see Ayala v. Bassett, 57 A.D.3d 387, 870 N.Y.S.2d 261 [1st Dept. 2008] ). Defendant's conclusory denial of service was insufficient to rebut the presumption of proper service created by the process server's properly executed affidavit (see id.; U.S. Bank N.A. v. Martinez, 139 A.D.3d 548, 549, 34 N.Y.S.3d 3 [1st Dept. 2016] ). While defendant alleged that he had never lived in Florida, the evidence showed the contrary. In 2011, defendant filed for bankruptcy, listing the Florida address as his residence. He failed to establish an alternative dwelling or usual place of abode where he could have been served (see Martinez, 139 A.D.3d at 549, 34 N.Y.S.3d 3).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 8814
Decided: March 26, 2019
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)