Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Aquiles Guzman, Defendant–Appellant.
_
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Raymond L. Bruce, J.), entered on or about March 10, 2017, which adjudicated defendant a level one sexually violent offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6–C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Although the People failed to provide written notice, 10 days in advance of the proceeding, of their intention to seek a sexually violent offender designation, which the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders had omitted from its recommendation, the court provided an appropriate remedy by adjourning the proceedings (see Correction Law §§ 168–k[2], 168–n[3]; People v. Lucas, 118 AD3d 415 [1st Dept 2014] ). Defendant does not dispute that his out-of-state conviction automatically qualified as an enumerated sexually violent offense, “leaving nothing to litigate in this regard” (People v. Bryant, 147 AD3d 412, 412 [1st Dept 2017], lv denied 29 NY3d 910 [2017]; see also People v. McLean, 144 AD3d 423 [1st Dept 2016] ). Moreover, defense counsel acknowledged that the adjournment gave her adequate time to prepare and stated that she did not seek to challenge the merits of defendant's sexually violent offender designation.
Defendant notes that the adjournment required him to take time to make an additional appearance in court. However, under these circumstances, we do not find that requirement so burdensome or prejudicial that defendant “should receive undeserved relief from his legally mandated sexually violent offender status” (Bryant, 147 AD3d at 412).
_
CLERK
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 7463
Decided: October 25, 2018
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)