Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. RAYSHON DAYS, DEFENDANT–APPELLANT.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that the case is held, the decision is reserved and the matter is remitted to Onondaga County Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of manslaughter in the first degree (Penal Law § 125.20[1] ). We agree with defendant that County Court failed to afford him the requisite “reasonable opportunity to present his contentions” on his motion to withdraw his guilty plea (People v. Tinsley, 35 N.Y.2d 926, 927; see People v. Frederick, 45 N.Y.2d 520, 525; People v. Carter, 144 A.D.2d 1034, 1035). Prior to sentencing, defendant wrote a letter to the sentencing court seeking to withdraw his plea on several grounds. Because certain of the grounds involved alleged improprieties on the part of the sentencing court, the court transferred the matter to another judge for determination of defendant's motion. It appears from the sentencing transcript, however, that the newly-assigned judge either did not have or did not review defendant's moving papers, and the judge refused defendant's repeated requests to submit his written contentions in support of the motion (cf. People v. Gaskin, 2 AD3d 347, 347, lv denied 2 NY3d 740; People v. Martin, 186 A.D.2d 823, 824, lv denied 81 N.Y.2d 791). Although the court verbally inquired into certain of defendant's claims, we cannot conclude that the judge “was sufficiently familiar with the case to make an informed determination on defendant's motion to withdraw the plea” (People v. Thompson, 60 A.D.2d 765, 765). For instance, in response to defendant's assertion regarding the justification defense, the court stated: “I don't know what happened there. That was their point. I am just here to sentence you.” We therefore conclude that, under the circumstances of this case, defendant was not “afford[ed] ․ a reasonable opportunity to advance his claims [such that] an informed and prudent determination [could] be rendered” (Frederick, 45 N.Y.2d at 525). We therefore hold the case, reserve decision, and remit the matter to County Court to afford defendant a reasonable opportunity to present his contentions in support of his motion to withdraw his plea (see People v. Anderson, 222 A.D.2d 515, 515–516).
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: KA 12–00113
Decided: February 13, 2015
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)