Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
KENNETH F. MAVING, PLAINTIFF–APPELLANT, v. LISA M. MAVING, DEFENDANT–RESPONDENT.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law without costs and defendant's application is denied.
Memorandum: In this divorce action, plaintiff appeals from an order granting defendant's quantum meruit application for attorneys' fees. The parties' stipulation of settlement, which was incorporated but not merged into the judgment of divorce, provided that defendant could make an application for attorneys' fees within 15 days of the date of the stipulation. Defendant's attorney, however, did not file the application until almost six months after the date of the stipulation.
Plaintiff contends that Supreme Court erred in granting defendant's late application for attorneys' fees, which was in violation of the stipulation of settlement. We agree. Because “[m]arital settlement agreements are judicially favored” (Simkin v. Blank, 19 NY3d 46, 52), “[o]nly where there is cause sufficient to invalidate a contract, such as fraud, collusion, mistake or accident, will a party be relieved from the consequences of a stipulation made during litigation” (Hallock v. State of New York, 64 N.Y.2d 224, 230, citing Matter of Frutiger, 29 N.Y.2d 143, 149–150). Here, defendant asserts that her attorney mistakenly thought he had 30 days from the entry of judgment of divorce to file the application. We conclude, however, that the unilateral mistake of defendant's attorney does not excuse defendant's failure to comply with the terms of a stipulation where, as here, the language in the stipulation is clear, unequivocal, and unambiguous (see Morey v. Sings, 174 A.D.2d 870, 872; Hirsch v. Manzione, 130 A.D.2d 714, 714–715; 27 Richard A. Lord, Williston on Contracts § 70:104 at 520 [4th ed 1990] ).
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: CA 14–01346
Decided: February 06, 2015
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)