Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
OSWEGO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, PETITIONER–RESPONDENT; HEATHER L., RESPONDENT–APPELLANT.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JOHN W. SPRING, JR., ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, PHOENIX.
STEPHANIE N. DAVIS, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, OSWEGO.
PAMELA A. MUNSON, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILDREN, FULTON.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law without costs and the matter is remitted to Family Court, Oswego County, for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: Respondent mother appeals from an order determining that she neglected the subject children. The record establishes that the mother failed to appear at the fact-finding hearing and that her attorney withdrew and did not participate therein. We agree with the mother that Family Court erred in allowing her attorney to withdraw and in proceeding with the hearing in the mother's absence, inasmuch as the attorney failed to provide reasonable notice to the mother that she planned to withdraw (see Matter of Meko M., 272 A.D.2d 953, 954). The mother's attorney did not make a written motion to withdraw as counsel and merely sent the mother a letter six days before the hearing stating she may withdraw if the mother did not appear for the hearing and thus failed to give the mother proper notice and time to respond. We note that, although the record fully supports a finding that the mother neglected the subject children, “ ‘such a finding may not stand [where, as here, the mother] was denied due process' “ (id.). We therefore reverse the order and remit the matter to Family Court for the assignment of new counsel and a new hearing on the petition.
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: CAF 12–02212
Decided: October 03, 2014
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)