Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK EX REL. KEVIN L. THOMAS, PETITIONER–RESPONDENT, v.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
BRIAN FISCHER, COMMISSIONER, NEW YORK STATE
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY
SUPERVISION, ANDREA EVANS, CHAIRWOMAN, NEW
YORK STATE BOARD OF PAROLE, SANDRA AMOIA,
SUPERINTENDENT, GROVELAND CORRECTIONAL FACILITY,
J. LAGEORIGA, SORC, GROVELAND CORRECTIONAL
FACILITY AND R. UNDERWOOD, INMATE RECORDS
COORDINATOR, GROVELAND CORRECTIONAL FACILITY,
RESPONDENTS–APPELLANTS.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law without costs and the petition is dismissed.
Memorandum: Respondents appeal from a judgment granting the petition for a writ of habeas corpus on the ground that petitioner had served three years of unrevoked parole, thereby requiring New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision (DOCCS) to terminate his sentence (see Correction Law § 205(4) [formerly Executive Law § 259–j (3–a) ] ). We agree with respondents that petitioner did not qualify for termination of his sentence, and we therefore reverse the judgment and dismiss the petition.
The record establishes that, in September 1999, petitioner was convicted of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree in violation of Penal Law § 220.18(1), a class A–II felony offense, and was sentenced to an indeterminate term of incarceration of eight years to life. Petitioner was released to parole supervision on May 15, 2007, but in March 2010, he was charged with multiple parole violations. A final parole revocation hearing was held on May 18, 2010, during which petitioner pleaded guilty to a parole violation he had committed on January 22, 2010. The parole violation was sustained and petitioner's parole was revoked.
“Correction Law § 205 provides, in pertinent part, that DOCCS ‘must grant termination of sentence after three years of unrevoked presumptive release or parole to a person serving an indeterminate sentence for a class A felony offense defined in [Penal Law article 220 or 221]’ “ (Matter of Miller v New York State Dept. of Corr. & Community Supervision, 105 AD3d 677, 677). Although petitioner's parole was not revoked until May 18, 2010, i.e., more than three years from the date of his release to parole supervision, “that revocation had the effect of interrupting his indeterminate sentence retroactively as of the date of his delinquency,” which was January 22, 2010 (id.; see Penal Law § 70.40[3][a] ). Thus, because petitioner's sentence was interrupted as of January 22, 2010 (see § 70.40[3][a] ), he was not “ serving an indeterminate sentence” on May 15, 2010, i.e., three years from the date he was released to parole supervision, as required by Correction Law § 205(4), and he therefore was not entitled to termination of his sentence.
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: KAH 13–01905
Decided: October 03, 2014
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)