Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Aimee E.-H., Petitioner–Respondent, v. Alexander H., Respondent–Appellant.
_
Order, Family Court, New York County (Gloria Sosa–Lintner, J.), entered on or about April 4, 2013, which denied respondent-appellant's objections to a support magistrate's order finding that respondent willfully violated a child support order, awarding petitioner a money judgment for child support arrears, and directing a good-faith payment of $20,000, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Respondent's admission that he failed to pay court-ordered child support constitutes prima facie evidence of a willful violation of the support order (see Matter of Powers v. Powers, 86 N.Y.2d 63, 69 [1995] ). Respondent failed to rebut this prima facie evidence with competent, credible evidence of his inability to make the required payments (see id. at 69–70). Although respondent asserted that his business had failed due to the economic downturn, he failed to provide evidence of his diminished income or show that he thereafter made reasonable efforts “to obtain employment commensurate with his qualifications and experience” (Matter of Heyward v. Goldman, 23 AD3d 468, 469 [2d Dept 2005] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Matter of Maria T. v. Kwame A., 35 AD3d 239, 240 [1st Dept 2006] ). There is no basis to disturb the credibility findings of the magistrate (In re Bristene B. 102 AD3d 562 [1st Dept 2013] ).
The Support Magistrate providently exercised its discretion in directing a good-faith payment of $20,000 (see e.g. Matter of Gorsky v. Kessler, 79 AD3d 746, 747 [2d Dept 2010] ), and in awarding post-petition arrears (see Family Ct Act § 459).
We have considered respondent's remaining arguments and find them unavailing.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
_
CLERK
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 1267 4
Decided: June 05, 2014
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)