Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. PERRY C. GRIGGS, DEFENDANT–APPELLANT.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon a jury verdict of robbery in the first degree (Penal Law § 160.15[4] ). Although we agree with defendant that he should not have been shackled when he testified before the grand jury, we conclude that reversal on that basis is not warranted. As the People correctly contend, the prosecutor's cautionary instructions to the grand jury were sufficient to dispel any potential prejudice to defendant (see People v. Burroughs, 108 AD3d 1103, 1106, lv denied 22 NY3d 995). Defendant contends that the prosecutor engaged in misconduct during the grand jury proceedings by failing to inform the members of the grand jury that defendant had requested that a certain witness be called. That contention is not preserved for our review inasmuch as defendant failed to move to dismiss the indictment on that ground (see People v. Gordon, 277 A.D.2d 1053, 1053, lv denied 96 N.Y.2d 759). In any event, the record establishes that, under the circumstances presented here, there was no “likelihood [or] possibility of prejudice” inasmuch as the witness did not observe the criminal transaction at issue (People v. Adessa, 89 N.Y.2d 677, 686). Defendant likewise failed to preserve for our review his further contention that the prosecutor engaged in misconduct by improperly cross-examining him before the grand jury (see Gordon, 277 A.D.2d at 1053).
We reject defendant's contention that he was denied effective assistance of counsel because counsel failed to make a motion to dismiss the indictment based upon the alleged defects in the grand jury proceedings (see generally People v. Baldi, 54 N.Y.2d 137, 147).
Contrary to defendant's further contention, the evidence at trial is legally sufficient to establish that he forcibly stole property from the victim while using a gun (see People v. Gerena, 49 AD3d 1204, 1205–1206, lv denied 10 NY3d 958; see generally People v. Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490, 495). Defendant asserts that he had a claim of right defense based on good faith, and he contends that the evidence of intent is legally insufficient when viewed in light of that defense. Defendant's contention is without merit, however, inasmuch as he failed to present any evidence that the particular bills making up the $30 he forcibly took from the victim “had any significance” to defendant (see People v. Pagan, 19 NY3d 91, 97–99). In any event, fungible cash is not a chattel within the scope of a claim of right defense based on good faith (see People v. Reid, 69 N.Y.2d 469, 476). Viewing the evidence in light of the elements of the crime as charged to the jury (see People v. Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 349), we conclude that the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence (see generally Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d at 495). The sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.
We have considered the remaining contentions of defendant in his main and pro se supplemental briefs and conclude that none warrant reversal or modification of the judgment.
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: KA 12–00121
Decided: May 09, 2014
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)