IN RE: DAVID ECHEVARRIA (2014)

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum:  Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking to annul the determination after a tier III hearing that he violated certain inmate rules, arising from an incident in which he was charged with participating in a fight that took place in a prison exercise yard.   He appeals from a judgment dismissing the petition.   Contrary to petitioner's contention, the “fact that the Hearing Officer had been the officer of the day at the time of the incident in question [does not] require disqualification pursuant to regulations of the Department of [Corrections and Community Supervision]” (Matter of Marquez v. Mann, 188 A.D.2d 956, 956;  see Matter of Parker v. Fischer, 70 AD3d 1086, 1087).

Petitioner further contends that the Hearing Officer erred in making a determination without reviewing certain evidence, and that petitioner was prejudiced by the deficient prehearing assistance provided by the correction officer assigned to assist him.   Petitioner failed to exhaust his administrative remedies with respect to those contentions because he failed to raise them in his administrative appeal, and this Court “has no discretionary authority to reach [them]” (Matter of Nelson v. Coughlin, 188 A.D.2d 1071, 1071, appeal dismissed 81 N.Y.2d 834).

Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court