Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. BURNIE DANIELS, DEFENDANT–APPELLANT.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon a jury verdict of criminal mischief in the third degree (Penal Law § 145.05[2] ) and petit larceny (§ 155.25). Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620, 621), we reject defendant's contention that the evidence is legally insufficient to support the conviction (see generally People v. Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490, 495). Furthermore, we conclude that defendant received meaningful representation (see generally People v. Baldi, 54 N.Y.2d 137, 147) and, viewing the evidence in light of the elements of the crimes as charged to the jury (see People v. Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 349), we also conclude that defendant's contention that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence lacks merit (see generally Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d at 495).
We agree with defendant that County Court erred in allowing the People to elicit testimony that defendant invoked his right to counsel (see People v. Nicholas, 286 A.D.2d 861, 862, affd 98 N.Y.2d 749; People v. Morrice, 61 AD3d 1390, 1391; People v. Hunt, 18 AD3d 891, 892), but we conclude that reversal is not required; the error is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt “inasmuch as there is no reasonable possibility that the error[ ] might have contributed to defendant's conviction” (People v. Capers, 94 AD3d 1475, 1476, lv denied 19 NY3d 971 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see People v. Kithcart, 85 AD3d 1558, 1559–1560, lv denied 17 NY3d 818; see generally People v. Crimmins, 36 N.Y.2d 230, 237). We also reject defendant's contention that he is entitled to a new trial based on a Brady violation. “ ‘[W]hile the People unquestionably have a duty to disclose exculpatory material in their control,’ a defendant's constitutional right to a fair trial is not violated when, as here, he is given a meaningful opportunity to use the allegedly exculpatory material ․ as evidence during his case” (People v. Cortijo, 70 N.Y.2d 868, 870; see People v. Comfort, 60 AD3d 1298, 1300, lv denied 12 NY3d 924; People v. Barney, 295 A.D.2d 1001, 1002, lv denied 98 N.Y.2d 766).
Finally, we reject defendant's contention that he is entitled to a new trial based on an alleged Rosario violation. Even assuming, arguendo, that all of the disputed evidence is Rosario material (see People v. Turner, 233 A.D.2d 932, 933, lv denied 89 N.Y.2d 1102; People v. Stern, 226 A.D.2d 238, 239–240, lv denied 88 N.Y.2d 969, reconsideration denied 88 N.Y.2d 1072), we conclude that reversal is not warranted here. With respect to the evidence that defendant contends was not timely disclosed, we conclude that defendant failed to make a showing that there is “a reasonable possibility that the result at trial would have been different if [that] material[ ] had been timely disclosed” (People v. Williams, 50 AD3d 1177, 1180; see CPL 240.75). With respect to the evidence disclosed only after trial, we conclude that defendant failed to “show[ ] ‘that there is a reasonable possibility that the non-disclosure materially contributed to the result of the trial’ “ (Williams, 50 AD3d at 1179, quoting CPL 240.75).
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: KA 09–02133
Decided: March 28, 2014
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)