Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Alvaro MICHIMANI, also known as Alvaro Garcia, Defendant–Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Seth L. Marvin, J. at suppression hearing; Raymond L. Bruce, J. at jury trial and sentencing), rendered November 14, 2011, convicting defendant of robbery in the second degree and bail jumping in the first degree, and sentencing him to consecutive terms of six years and one to three years, unanimously affirmed.
The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v. Danielson, 9 N.Y.3d 342, 348–349 [2007] ). There is no basis for disturbing the jury's determinations concerning credibility and identification. The evidence clearly established that defendant was a participant in a robbery.
The court properly denied defendant's suppression motion. Shortly after midnight, officers received a radio transmission of “shots fired,” followed by a transmission describing a group of 8 to 10 men. In very close temporal and spacial proximity to the transmissions and the specified location, the officers saw a group of men, alone on a deserted street, matching the description in several respects including number, age and ethnicity. This provided, at least, a founded suspicion justifying a common-law inquiry. The bounds of such an inquiry were not exceeded when, as a safety precaution, the greatly outnumbered officers, who did not draw their weapons, directed the group to stop and line up along a storefront (see People v. Bora, 83 N.Y.2d 531, 531–535 [1994]; People v. Francois, 61 A.D.3d 524, 525, 877 N.Y.S.2d 54 [1st Dept 2009], affd 14 N.Y.3d 732 [2010]; People v. Herold, 282 A.D.2d 1, 7, 726 N.Y.S.2d 65 [1st Dept 2001], lv denied 97 N.Y.2d 682 [2001] ). Defendant then fled, and we conclude that his flight was not the product of any unlawful police conduct. Defendant's flight, coupled with the other circumstances, provided reasonable suspicion justifying pursuit (see People v. Woods, 98 N.Y.2d 627 [2002]; People v. Cintron, 304 A.D.2d 454, 758 N.Y.S.2d 636 [1st Dept 2003], lv denied 100 N.Y.2d 579 [2003] ), followed by a brief investigatory detention. The subsequent recovery of a firearm from along the path of defendant's flight provided probable cause for his arrest (see id. at 454, 758 N.Y.S.2d 636, which resulted in the recovery of additional evidence.
We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: March 18, 2014
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)