Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: JEREMIAH M., A Dependent Child Under the Age of Eighteen Years, etc., Sabrina Ann M., etc., Respondent–Appellant, SCO Family of Services, Petitioner–Respondent.
Order, Family Court, Bronx County (Anne–Marie Jolly, J.), entered on or about December 7, 2011, which, upon a fact-finding determination that respondent-appellant mother suffers from a mental illness, terminated her parental rights to the subject child, and committed custody and guardianship of the child to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of Social Services for the purpose of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Petitioner met its burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence that respondent is mentally ill within the meaning of Social Services Law § 384–b(4)(c) and (6)(a) (see Matter of Joyce T., 65 N.Y.2d 39, 46 [1985]; Matter of Genesis S. [Irene Elizabeth S.], 70 AD3d 570 [1st Dept 2010] ). The report and testimony from a psychologist who reviewed respondent's medical records and conducted a clinical interview, finding that respondent suffers from schizophrenia and her prognosis is very poor, supports the determination that she is incapable of caring for the child presently and for the foreseeable future (see Matter of Justin Javonte R. [Leticia W.], 103 AD3d 524 [1st Dept 2013]; Matter of Marlyn J'ace A. [Lynora A.], 101 AD3d 646 [1st Dept 2012], lv denied 21 NY3d 851 [2013]; Matter of Sharon Crystal F. [Nicole Valerie D.], 89 AD3d 639 [1st Dept 2011], lv denied 18 NY3d 808 [2012] ). The court was permitted to draw a negative inference from the fact that the mother, while present at the hearing, did not testify (see Matter of Alford Isaiah B. [Alford B.], 107 AD3d 562 [1st Dept 2013] ).
Respondent's argument that the court erred in failing to hold a separate dispositional hearing is not preserved for appellate review, and we decline to review it in the interest of justice (see id.). Alternatively, we reject it on the merits, as a separate dispositional hearing was not required since this is a case of termination for mental illness (see Matter of Joyce T., 65 N.Y.2d at 46–50; Matter of Faith D.A. [Natasha A.], 99 AD3d 641 [1st Dept 2012]; Matter of Ashanti A., 56 AD3d 373, 373–374 [1st Dept 2008] ).
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: September 24, 2013
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)