Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: James WOODS, Petitioner–Appellant, v. Meenakshi SRINIVASAN, etc., et al., Respondents–Respondents.
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Fernando Tapia, J.), entered October 6, 2011, denying the petition and dismissing the proceeding, brought pursuant to CPLR Article 78, to annul a determination by respondent Board of Standards and Appeals of the City of New York (BSA), dated July 13, 2010, which denied petitioner's zoning variance application, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the matter remanded to respondent BSA for reconsideration of petitioner's application.
The evidence presented at the hearing establishes that petitioner erected a building on his property in good faith reliance upon a construction permit issued by respondent DOB, which DOB invalidated only after the building's substantial completion (see Matter of Pantelidis v. New York City Bd. of Stds. & Appeals, 10 Misc.3d 1077(A) [Sup Ct, N.Y. County 2005], affd 43 AD3d 314 [1st Dept 2007], affd 10 NY3d 846 [2008]; Jayne Estates, Inc. v. Raynor, 22 N.Y.2d 417, 422 [1968] ). Petitioner's architect understood that DOB's interpretation of ZR § 23–49 permitted the building to be constructed along the property's side lot line, and DOB's plan examiner fully reviewed petitioner's plans for compliance with zoning regulations and approved them. Thereafter, DOB issued construction permits and petitioner erected his building in reliance upon the approved plans and permits. DOB subsequently changed its interpretation of the ZR § 23–49 and issued a stop work order.
Contrary to the motion court's finding, DOB, not petitioner, was in the best position to avoid the erroneous issuance of the permit. BSA's determination denying petitioner's variance application on the ground that he did not rely, in good faith, on DOB's permit, must be annulled, and the matter remanded to BSA to consider whether petitioner satisfied the remaining elements required for a variance (see ZR § 72–21).
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: July 02, 2013
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)