PEOPLE v. NEWKIRK (2012)

On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon a nonjury verdict of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (Penal Law § 265.03 [3] ), defendant contends that the evidence is legally insufficient to establish that he possessed the loaded firearm found by the police in the basement of a suspected drug house in which he was located when the police executed a search warrant (see generally People v. Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490, 495). We reject that contention. The evidence at trial established that defendant was the only person in the house when the police entered, and an officer testified that, immediately before the police gained entry, he heard the sounds of someone inside running down and then up the basement stairs. When questioned by the police, defendant admitted that he had purchased the firearm in question, a photograph of which was on the screen saver of defendant's cell phone, and it was later determined that defendant's DNA was on the firearm. That evidence, when viewed in the light most favorable to the People (see People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620, 621), is legally sufficient to establish that defendant possessed the firearm (see § 10.00[8]; People v.. Manini, 79 N.Y.2d 561, 573–574; People v. Sierra, 45 N.Y.2d 56, 59–60).

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

MEMORANDUM: