Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Mott Street LLC, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Fountainhead Construction LLC, et al., Defendants–Respondents.
_
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Judith J. Gische, J.), entered July 2, 2009, which granted defendants' motion to dismiss the first, fourth, and fifth through ninth causes of action, unanimously modified, on the law, to deny the motion as to the first and fifth through ninth causes of action, and otherwise affirmed, with costs.
The complaint alleges that defendant Abrams, the principal of defendant Fountainhead Construction LLC, induced plaintiff to make a $1.5 million “down payment” to Fountainhead against a “to be negotiated” construction contract, “always intend[ing]” to divert the funds for purposes other than the construction on plaintiff's property. These allegations state a cause of action for fraud (see Shisgal v. Brown, 21 AD3d 845, 846–847 [2005] ). Limited Liability Company Law § 609 does not insulate Abrams from a fraud in which he personally participated (see Pludeman v Northern Leasing Sys., Inc., 10 NY3d 486, 491 [2008] ). By alleging in pertinent detail that Fountainhead was insolvent and that Abrams transferred plaintiff's down payment out of Fountainhead to pay his personal debts and those of his other businesses, the complaint states a cause of action for fraudulent conveyance under Debtor and Creditor Law §§ 273–276–a.
The motion to dismiss was correctly granted as to the fourth cause of action, which, inter alia, does not specify the section of the Business Corporation Law that allegedly was violated.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
_
CLERK
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 4841 277
Decided: April 19, 2011
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)