Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Macquarie Holdings (USA) Inc., Petitioner-Respondent, v. Robert Song, Respondent-Appellant.
_
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marcy S. Friedman, J.), entered December 3, 2009, which granted the petition to stay arbitration before the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the petition denied, and the proceeding dismissed.
When respondent became an employee of petitioner, he signed a Uniform Application for Securities Industry Registration or Transfer form (Form U-4), in which he agreed to arbitrate any disputes arising with petitioner under the rules of FINRA. He subsequently executed a letter agreement (Agreement), which requires arbitration of all claims arising from the employment relationship with petitioner under the Employment Dispute Resolution Rules of the American Arbitration Association, except for, in pertinent part, “a claim that would otherwise be covered under a U4 agreement.”
Since respondent's claims in this wrongful termination action are covered under the Form U-4, they fall within the “carve out” provision of the Agreement and therefore are not subject to petitioner's mandatory arbitration procedures (see Credit Suisse First Boston Corp. v Pitofsky, 4 NY3d 149 [2005] ). The Agreement does not unambiguously supplant the Form U-4, and any ambiguity in the Agreement must be construed against petitioner as the drafter thereof (see generally Yudell v. Israel & Assoc., 248 A.D.2d 189, 189-190 [1998] ).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
_
CLERK
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 4542N
Decided: March 17, 2011
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)