Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. GLORIA T. GONZALEZ, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting her of assault in the second degree (Penal Law § 120.05[2] ) and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (§ 265.02[1] ), defendant contends that she was denied a fair trial by three statements made by the prosecutor during his summation. By failing to object to any of those statements, defendant has failed to preserve her contention for our review (see CPL 470.05[2]; People v. Carpenter, 52 AD3d 1050, 1051, lv denied 11 NY3d 735, cert denied _ U.S. _, 129 S Ct 1613; People v. McNear, 265 A.D.2d 810, 811-812, lv denied 94 N.Y.2d 864). In any event, defendant's contention is without merit. To the extent that the statements could be interpreted as a reference to defendant's failure to testify at trial, any error with respect to the statements is harmless. County Court instructed the jury on several occasions throughout the trial that defendant had no burden to testify or present any evidence, and the court further explicitly instructed the jury that it could not draw any unfavorable inference from defendant's failure to testify. Given those instructions and the overwhelming evidence of defendant's guilt, there is no reasonable possibility that the prosecutor's statements might have contributed to the conviction (see generally People v. Crimmins, 36 N.Y.2d 230, 237; People v. Valdez, 262 A.D.2d 338, 339, lv denied 93 N.Y.2d 1028; People v. Torres, 213 A.D.2d 503, lv denied 88 N.Y.2d 996).
Finally, we note that the certificate of conviction incorrectly recites that defendant was convicted of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and it must therefore be amended to recite that defendant was convicted of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree under Penal Law § 265.02(1) (see People v. Saxton, 32 AD3d 1286).
Patricia L. Morgan
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: KA 08-02118
Decided: February 10, 2011
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)