Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: NORMA WARRIOR, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. ROBERT E. BEATMAN, SR., RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
STEVEN J. LORD, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, ARCADE, FOR ROBERT B., JR.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, the petition is reinstated and the matter is remitted to Family Court, Cattaraugus County, for a hearing on the petition.
Memorandum: Petitioner mother appeals from an order dismissing her petition alleging that respondent father had violated a prior order that, inter alia, awarded custody of the parties' child to the father and established a visitation schedule for the mother. The mother contends that Family Court was biased against her, as evidenced by certain statements made by the court. We reject that contention. The statement of the court that the violation petition in question was the 11th petition filed by the mother during a 7-year period and its observation that the mother's latest modification petition was then pending on appeal does not reflect bias on the part of the court (see generally Matter of Roystar T., 72 AD3d 1569, lv denied 15 NY3d 707). We agree with the mother, however, that the court erred in dismissing the petition without conducting a hearing inasmuch as the petition alleges sufficient factual and legal grounds to establish a violation of the prior order (see Matter of Lisa B.I. v. Carl D.I., 46 AD3d 1451). We therefore reverse the order, reinstate the petition and remit the matter to Family Court for a hearing on the petition.
Patricia L. Morgan
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: CAF 10-00198
Decided: December 30, 2010
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)