Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. David Price, Defendant-Appellant.
_
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ronald A. Zweibel, J.), rendered November 17, 2008, as amended February 25, 2009, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of assault in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to an aggregate term of 7 years, unanimously affirmed.
Defendant did not preserve his claim that the court should have given the jury a specific instruction on how to consider a witness's prior criminal convictions in assessing credibility, and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. We reject defendant's argument that his claim should he deemed preserved because the prosecutor asked the court a question at the end of its charge that supposedly alluded to the same issue defendant is raising on appeal. As an alternative holding, we find that the court's charge, viewed as a whole, sufficiently instructed the jury on the subject of credibility (see People v. Whalen, 59 N.Y.2d 273, 279 [1983] ).
Defendant did not preserve any of his challenges to the prosecutor's summation, and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we also reject them on the merits (see People v. Overlee, 236 A.D.2d 133 [1997], lv denied 91 N.Y.2d 976 [1992]; People v. D'Alessandro, 184 A.D.2d 114, 118-119 [1992], lv denied 81 N.Y.2d 884 [1993] ).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
_
CLERK
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 3432- 3433
Decided: October 21, 2010
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)