Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Natalie Maria D., A Dependent Child Under Eighteen Years of Age, etc., Miguel D., Respondent-Appellant, The Children's Aid Society, Petitioner-Respondent.
Tamara A. Steckler, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Judith Harris of counsel), Law Guardian.
_
Order, Family Court, Bronx County (Clark V. Richardson, J.), entered on or about December 4, 2007, which determined, after a fact-finding hearing, that respondent father permanently neglected the subject child, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Appeal from order of disposition, same court and Judge, entered on or about November 21, 2007, which, upon a fact-finding of permanent neglect, terminated respondent's parental rights and committed the custody and guardianship of the child to petitioner agency and the Administration for Children's Services for the purpose of adoption, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as taken from a nonappealable paper.
Respondent failed to appear at the dispositional hearing, his counsel did not participate, and he has not offered any explanation for his failure to appear. Thus, the order of disposition was entered upon respondent's default, and it is not appealable by him (see Matter of Raymond Anthony S., 309 A.D.2d 520 [2003] ).
The agency demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence that it made diligent efforts to assist respondent to reunite with the child and that respondent rejected assistance in obtaining housing, although he was continually unable on his own to find a suitable place to live with the child, and refused to plan for the return of the child separately from the mother, despite his stated understanding that the child was not safe in the mother's care (see Social Services Law § 384-b[7][a]; Matter of Sheila G., 61 N.Y.2d 368 [1984]; Matter of Kimberly Rosemarie S., 211 A.D.2d 594 [1995], lv denied 85 N.Y.2d 809 [1995] ).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
_
CLERK
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 2792- 2792A
Decided: May 13, 2010
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)