Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: SHAMEL R., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant. Presentment Agency.
Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Susan R. Larabee, J.), entered on or about April 30, 2009, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent upon a fact-finding determination that he committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of assault in the second degree (two counts), obstructing governmental administration in the second degree, resisting arrest and menacing in the third degree (two counts), and ordered restrictive placement with the Office of Children and Family Services for a period of three years, and order of disposition, same court (Jane Pearl, J.), entered on or about April 30, 2009, which revoked appellant's probation and placed him with OCFS for a period of 18 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The court properly exercised its discretion in ordering restrictive placement, which included denial of credit for time served, an initial nine-month placement in a secure facility, followed by a minimum placement of one year in a residential facility. Given the seriousness of the appellant's repeated violent behavior both in and out of custody, his violent conduct only four months after being placed on probation, his general lack of cooperation, and a psychologist's unfavorable report, the placement was the least restrictive alternative consistent with appellant's needs and best interests and the community's need for protection (see Matter of Katherine W., 62 N.Y.2d 947, 479 N.Y.S.2d 190, 468 N.E.2d 28 [1984] ).
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: December 03, 2009
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)