Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Leonari JONES, an Infant by Her Mother and Natural Guardian, Barry ALICEA, et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Lucy Billings, J.), entered on July 1, 2008, inter alia, after a jury trial on the issue of damages, awarding infant plaintiff $1.5 million for past pain and suffering, $1.5 million for future pain and suffering and $110,783 over four years for future medical expenses, upon plaintiff's stipulation, in lieu of a new trial on future medical expenses, to reduce that award from $133,000 to $110,783, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Infant plaintiff was injured when, while attempting to exit defendant's train, the door closed on her right foot and she was dragged along the length of the platform as the train departed from the station. As a result of the accident, infant plaintiff, who was 10 years old at the time, sustained, inter alia, a distal tibia fracture which resulted in one leg being 20mm shorter than the other, repeated knee dislocation with concomitant pain, second degree burns on ten percent of her body from scraping on the cement platform, as well as permanent scarring and severe psychological injuries. Under the circumstances, the awards of $1.5 million for past pain and suffering and $1.5 million for future pain and suffering did not deviate materially from what would be reasonable compensation (CPLR 5501[c]; see e.g. Lopez v. Gomez, 305 A.D.2d 292, 761 N.Y.S.2d 601 [2003]; Carl v. Daniels, 268 A.D.2d 395, 702 N.Y.S.2d 279 [2000], lv. denied 96 N.Y.2d 704, 723 N.Y.S.2d 130, 746 N.E.2d 185 [2001] ).
The award of $110,783 for future medical expenses for four years was properly reduced by the trial court from $133,000 in light of the evidence before it, and we find no basis for a further reduction.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: October 20, 2009
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)