Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: CHRISTOPHER H., and Others, Children Alleged to be Permanently Neglected. Santiago A., Respondent-Appellant, Victoria Tselane H., etc., Respondent, Little Flower Children's Services, Petitioner-Respondent.
Orders of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Rhoda Cohen, J.), entered on or about April 22, 1999, insofar as appealed from, terminating respondent-appellant's parental rights to the subject children and awarding their custody and guardianship to the Commissioner of Social Services and petitioner agency for purposes of adoption, upon a fact-finding determination of permanent neglect, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Clear and convincing evidence, namely, the testimony of petitioner's caseworker, supports the finding that appellant, although able to do so, failed to maintain substantial and continuous contact with and to plan for the future of the children for more than a year preceding the filing of the instant petitions. That same testimony also supports the finding that diligent efforts by petitioner to encourage respondent's parental relationship with the children were frustrated by his uncooperativeness in failing to establish paternity legally, failing to attend planning meetings at the agency, and failing to attend all but two of 37 scheduled visits during the relevant year and failing to pursue a plan for day visits with the children in his home (see, Matter of O. Children, 128 A.D.2d 460, 513 N.Y.S.2d 153). No basis exists to disturb Family Court's findings crediting the caseworker's testimony over that of petitioner. The best interests of the children, who have been living together in a loving foster home for a period of six to eight years, require that they be freed for adoption.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 28, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)