Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Johnny JONES, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Marcy L. Kahn, J.), rendered September 22, 2003, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of burglary in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of 5 years, unanimously affirmed.
The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. The evidence supported the conclusion that defendant unlawfully entered a hotel with the contemporaneous intent to commit a crime therein. Among other things, the evidence established that he tried to break into a hotel room after taking steps to avoid detection (see People v. Gilligan, 42 N.Y.2d 969, 398 N.Y.S.2d 269, 367 N.E.2d 867 [1977]; People v. Sainvil, 251 A.D.2d 46, 673 N.Y.S.2d 667 [1998], lv. denied 92 N.Y.2d 930, 680 N.Y.S.2d 471, 703 N.E.2d 283 [1998] ).
The trial court properly declined to submit criminal trespass in the second degree as a lesser included offense, since there was no reasonable view of the evidence, viewed most favorably to defendant, to support such a charge (see People v. Warfield, 6 A.D.3d 218, 774 N.Y.S.2d 324 [2004], lv. denied 3 N.Y.3d 650, 782 N.Y.S.2d 421, 816 N.E.2d 211 [2004]; People v. Mauricio, 215 A.D.2d 326, 627 N.Y.S.2d 26 [1995], lv. denied 86 N.Y.2d 738, 631 N.Y.S.2d 618, 619, 655 N.E.2d 715, 716 [1995] ). The theory that defendant posits as warranting submission of criminal trespass is both unsupported by any evidence and contradicted by defendant's own statements to hotel employees and the police.
We have considered and rejected defendant's remaining claims.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: October 19, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)