Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
NORTHERN FUNDING, LLC, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. 244 MADISON REALTY CORP., et al., Defendants-Respondents.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Herman Cahn, J.), entered January 17, 2007, which, in an action against a residential cooperative and its directors seeking, inter alia, to compel a transfer of shares appurtenant to an apartment, granted defendants' cross motion to add as necessary parties the Department of Finance of the State of New York and Emigrant Savings Bank, and denied plaintiffs' motion for a mandatory preliminary injunction with leave to renew after an amended complaint has been served and filed, unanimously modified, on the law, to deny that portion of the cross motion seeking to add Emigrant Savings Bank as a necessary party, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.
The Department of Finance is a necessary party, there being issues of fact as to whether it has valid liens against the subject shares (CPLR 1001[a]; see Russell v. City of New York, 22 A.D.2d 706, 253 N.Y.S.2d 778 [1964], affd. 16 N.Y.2d 641, 261 N.Y.S.2d 79, 209 N.E.2d 119 [1965]; Costa v. Harris, 26 A.D.2d 933, 274 N.Y.S.2d 434 [1966] ). However, the UCC statement submitted by plaintiffs demonstrates that the lien held by Emigrant Savings Bank has been satisfied, and we modify accordingly. The mandatory preliminary injunction that plaintiffs seek would impermissibly grant them the ultimate relief sought, prior to the addition of a necessary party and joinder of issue (see St. Paul Fire & Mar. Ins. Co. v. York Claims Serv., 308 A.D.2d 347, 348-349, 765 N.Y.S.2d 573 [2003] ). For present purposes, we note UCC 8-401(a)(4) (issuer of stock to register a transfer of stock if “any applicable law relating to the collection of taxes has been complied with”), but do not rule on its applicability. We have considered plaintiffs' other arguments and find them unavailing.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: June 12, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)