SIPPEL v. SIPPEL (1997)

 Supreme Court erred in vacating the stipulation entered into by the parties in open court before the Referee on the ground that it is unconscionable.   It is well settled that the court, upon motion or its own initiative, “may confirm or reject, in whole or in part * * * the report of a referee to report;  may make new findings with or without taking additional testimony;  and may order a new trial or hearing” (CPLR 4403).   Furthermore, before entry of a judgment of divorce, a party may by motion seek to set aside a stipulation on the ground that it was not fair and reasonable at the time of its making or is unconscionable (see, Sheridan v. Sheridan, 202 A.D.2d 749, 750-751, 608 N.Y.S.2d 582;  Domestic Relations Law § 236[B] [3] ).   Such a stipulation will be set aside only “upon the demonstration of good cause, such as mistake, fraud, duress or overreaching [citations omitted], or when found to be unconscionable” (Cantamessa v. Cantamessa, 170 A.D.2d 792, 793, 565 N.Y.S.2d 895).   Defendant's conclusory statements that the stipulation in this matter was not fair and reasonable at the time of its making or is unconscionable do not provide a basis to set it aside (see, Robinson v. Robinson, 111 A.D.2d 316, 317, 489 N.Y.S.2d 301, appeal dismissed 66 N.Y.2d 613, 498 N.Y.S.2d 1030, 489 N.E.2d 258, mot. to vacate denied 66 N.Y.2d 855, 498 N.Y.S.2d 367, 489 N.E.2d 254, rearg. denied 67 N.Y.2d 647, 499 N.Y.S.2d 1032, 490 N.E.2d 558).   Because stipulations in marital actions are more closely scrutinized than other contracts, however, whether the stipulation is fair and reasonable or unconscionable is an issue upon which the court may take proof (see, Sheridan v. Sheridan, supra, at 751, 608 N.Y.S.2d 582).   Consequently, summary disposition is inappropriate.   We therefore modify the order by denying defendant's cross motion, and we remit the matter to Supreme Court for further proceedings consistent with this decision (see, Sheridan v. Sheridan, supra, at 751, 608 N.Y.S.2d 582).

Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs and matter remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings.

MEMORANDUM: