Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Donald E. AUBRECHT and Sharon Ann Aubrecht, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. ACME ELECTRIC CORPORATION, Defendant-Respondent,
The L.C. Whitford Co., Inc., Defendant-Appellant, et al., Defendant. The L.C. Whitford Co., Inc., Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Fontanese Folts Aubrecht Architects, P.C., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.
Donald E. Aubrecht (plaintiff), an architect, was injured at a construction site while inspecting an interior wall soffit. He fell five or six feet when the scaffold on which he was standing collapsed. Plaintiff was vice-president of third-party defendant, which contracted with defendant Acme Electric Corporation to provide architectural design and supervision in connection with the construction of a manufacturing plant. The scaffold was owned and assembled by employees of defendant The L.C. Whitford Co., Inc. (LCW), the general contractor. Plaintiffs commenced this action alleging violations of Labor Law § 240(1), § 241(6) and § 200 and common-law negligence.
Supreme Court properly granted plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment on liability under Labor Law § 240(1) and denied that part of the cross motion of LCW for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Plaintiff is within the class of persons for whom Labor Law § 240(1) and § 241(6) liability is imposed because his work was essential to the construction of a building or structure and he was employed by an entity hired by the owner for such purpose (see, Nowak v. Kiefer, 256 A.D.2d 1129, 685 N.Y.S.2d 151, lv. dismissed and denied 93 N.Y.2d 887, 689 N.Y.S.2d 428, 711 N.E.2d 642; see generally, Mordkofsky v. V.C.V. Dev. Corp., 76 N.Y.2d 573, 576-577, 561 N.Y.S.2d 892, 563 N.E.2d 263; Lawyer v. Rotterdam Ventures, 204 A.D.2d 878, 879-880, 612 N.Y.S.2d 682, lv. dismissed 84 N.Y.2d 864, 618 N.Y.S.2d 8, 642 N.E.2d 327; cf., Martinez v. City of New York, 93 N.Y.2d 322, 690 N.Y.S.2d 524, 712 N.E.2d 689). Plaintiffs are entitled to partial summary judgment on liability under section 240(1) because plaintiff was injured in a fall from an elevated worksite (see, Rocovich v. Consolidated Edison Co., 78 N.Y.2d 509, 512-514, 577 N.Y.S.2d 219, 583 N.E.2d 932).
With respect to the Labor Law § 200 and common-law negligence claims, LCW failed to meet its initial burden of establishing that it was not negligent in connection with the collapse of the scaffold.
Order unanimously affirmed with costs.
MEMORANDUM:
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: June 18, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)