Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Anthony BEAKER, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alexander W. Hunter, Jr., J.), rendered June 20, 2002, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts) and criminal sale of a controlled substance near school grounds (two counts), and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 7 to 14 years, unanimously affirmed.
The court properly denied defendant's suppression motion. Since defendant's arguments at the suppression hearing were completely different from those raised on appeal, his current arguments are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would find that the police had reasonable suspicion upon which to stop defendant, since he matched a sufficiently detailed description provided by the undercover officer, was observed fleeing the sale location minutes after the sale, and was stopped a few blocks from the location (see People v. Rampersant, 272 A.D.2d 202, 708 N.Y.S.2d 70, lv. denied 95 N.Y.2d 870, 715 N.Y.S.2d 225, 738 N.E.2d 373). Upon stopping defendant, the police were entitled to detain him briefly for investigative purposes (see People v. Hicks, 68 N.Y.2d 234, 508 N.Y.S.2d 163, 500 N.E.2d 861), and were justified in handcuffing defendant, particularly since he had previously attempted to flee (see People v. Jennings, 281 A.D.2d 285, 722 N.Y.S.2d 141, lv. denied 96 N.Y.2d 903, 730 N.Y.S.2d 800, 756 N.E.2d 88). The undercover officer's confirmatory identification provided probable cause for defendant's arrest.
We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: May 27, 2004
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)