OSTROWSKI v. Town of West Seneca, Defendant-Respondent. (2009)

 Plaintiffs commenced this action seeking damages for the wrongful death and conscious pain and suffering of their son (decedent), who was killed while snow tubing down a hill.   The accident occurred when decedent failed to stop at the bottom of the hill and was struck by a truck on Indian Church Road. Supreme Court properly granted the motion of defendant Town of West Seneca (Town) seeking summary judgment dismissing the complaint against it.   The Town met its initial burden by establishing that it had no duty with respect to Indian Church Road, which it did not own, control or maintain (see Ernest v. Red Cr. Cent. School Dist., 93 N.Y.2d 664, 675, 695 N.Y.S.2d 531, 717 N.E.2d 690, rearg. denied 93 N.Y.2d 1042, 697 N.Y.S.2d 571, 719 N.E.2d 932;  Ossmer v. Bates, 97 A.D.2d 871, 469 N.Y.S.2d 273).   The Town further established that it did not owe decedent any duty to maintain the hill in question because it did not own, occupy or control that property (see Battaglia v. Town of Bethlehem, 46 A.D.3d 1151, 1154, 848 N.Y.S.2d 722;   Ajlouny v. Town of Huntington, 184 A.D.2d 486, 487, 584 N.Y.S.2d 608).   The evidence submitted by plaintiffs in opposition to the motion establishing that the Town undertook actions that it had no legal obligation to perform by erecting barriers at the bottom of the hill following the accident is insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact whether the Town owed a duty to decedent at the time of the accident (see generally Castiglione v. Village of Ellenville, 291 A.D.2d 769, 770-771, 738 N.Y.S.2d 443, lv. denied 98 N.Y.2d 604, 746 N.Y.S.2d 278, 773 N.E.2d 1016).

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

MEMORANDUM: