Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Application of Yashua Amen SHEKHEM EL BEY, Petitioner, For a Judgment, etc., v. The NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, et al., Respondents.
Determination of respondent Correction Commissioner, dated on or about April 27, 2000, dismissing petitioner from his position as a correction officer, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Alice Schlesinger, J.], entered on or about December 1, 2000), dismissed, without costs.
There is no merit to petitioner's argument that the charge of falsely claiming exemption from Federal income taxation was barred by the 18-month Statute of Limitations in Civil Service Law § 75(4). Such misconduct constituted a crime under 26 USC § 7205 (fraudulent withholding exemption certificate or failure to supply information) and Penal Law § 175.30 (offering a false instrument for filing in the second degree), and, as such, is expressly excluded from section 75(4) (see, Matter of Mieles v. Safir, 272 A.D.2d 199, 707 N.Y.S.2d 437). Substantial evidence supports respondent's findings that petitioner submitted false information on a Certificate of Exemption and Withholding in Lieu of IRS Form W-4, was excessively absent, left his residence without authorization while on sick leave, failed to log in and out with the Health Management Division, failed to comply with an instruction to present his firearms to the Health Maintenance Division, and attended an administrative hearing in another matter without authorization while on sick leave, all in violation of respondent's rules. No basis exists to disturb respondent's findings of credibility. The penalty of dismissal does not shock our sense of fairness (see, Matter of Pell v. Board of Educ., 34 N.Y.2d 222, 233, 356 N.Y.S.2d 833, 313 N.E.2d 321).
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: May 09, 2002
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)