Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of State of New York, Respondent, v. Kevin WHITE, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berkman, J. at hearing; Dorothy Cropper, J. at jury trial and sentence), rendered January 13, 2000, convicting defendant of burglary in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 8 years, unanimously affirmed.
Defendant's suppression motion was properly denied. There is no basis upon which to disturb the court's credibility determinations, which are supported by the record (see, People v. Prochilo, 41 N.Y.2d 759, 761, 395 N.Y.S.2d 635, 363 N.E.2d 1380). In the early morning hours, the police responded to a call of a burglary in progress and spoke to a citizen-informant, who stated that she had just seen the man whom she had called about in the back area of a nearby building that she pointed out. Only moments later, the police observed defendant, who matched the general description of the suspect, leaving the front of the building, after exhibiting some difficulty in opening the door. Under these circumstances, particularly in view of the lateness of the hour and absence of other persons, it was reasonable to conclude that defendant was the described suspect. This provided reasonable suspicion that defendant had engaged in criminal activity, which justified the brief investigatory stop and detention. When defendant made statements concerning his presence in the building that clearly indicated that he was, at least, a trespasser, the police had probable cause to arrest him, and suppression of the fruits of that arrest was properly denied (see, People v. Rodriguez, 159 A.D.2d 201, 552 N.Y.S.2d 13, lv. denied 76 N.Y.2d 742, 558 N.Y.S.2d 904, 557 N.E.2d 1200).
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: April 11, 2002
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)